A community forum shared by EM sonographers of the GWU and Georgetown departments of Emergency Medicine

Abdominal pain: “But I have an IUD, doctor”

A 22 year old female G6P6 presented with abdominal pain and discomfort for four weeks.  Past medical history was significant for three cesarean sections. She had undergone IUD insertion one year ago for purposes of birth control.  She took no medicines, and was allergic to penicillin.

Physical Exam:
Gen: WD/WN/WH, mildly anxious
HEENT: NC/AT, PERRLA, EOMI,
CV: RRR, no M/R/G
Lungs: CTA bilaterally
Abd: Soft, NT/ND, no masses, no HSM, mildly TTP at suprapubic abdomen, L>R
Ext: no C/C/E, equal bilateral pedal pulses

Labs:
WBC:  5.6
H/H: 12.6/ 36.0
Platelets:  220
Na: 137
K: 4.2
Cl: 112
HCO3: 24
BUN: 12
Cr: 1.2

While a urine pregnancy test was pending, the physician performed a transabdominal ultrasound:

FHR

Figure 1: Longitudinal still shot of the uterus demonstrating an IUP with FHR at 167. Nrml FHR generally ranges from 120-160.

CRL

Figure 2: Using the OB presets on the machine allows measurement of the crown rump length and estimates of gestational age.


Download Video

Figure 3: This transverse view of uterus demonstrates the IUP. Watch for the bright, “T”-shapes object which appears as the operator scans through the uterus in the last 2 seconds of the clip.


Download Video

Figure 4: The green arrow on this longitudinal view of the uterus demonstrates the presence of the IUD.

Intrauterine devices have until recently been considered a poor choice of birth control for nulliparous women due to a concern for increased rates of PID and subsequent increased risk for ectopic pregnancy.  In 1974, the CDC raised questions about the Dalkon Shield, an IUD marketed between 1970 and 1974, and found an excess risk of complicated pregnancies among the Dalkon Shield users compared with users of other IUDs. The manufacturer withdrew the device from the market in 1974. While this device is still more commonly placed in multips, the IUD is now considered safe for all women as a pregnancy prevention device provided there is no increased risk of exposure to STDs. In the United States there are two commercially available IUDs: a copper device which may be left in place for 10 years,  and a hormonal device which must be replaced every five years. While the presence of an IUD alone does not confer an increased risk of ectopic pregnancy, pregnancies which occur with an IUD in place (failure rate < 1% in first year) are more likely to be ectopic. The presence of an IUD with an intrauterine pregnancy is usually grounds for removal as the presence of the IUD may cause complications with the developing pregnancy.

Recommended reading: Nagamani P, Graham D, Levine D. Imaging of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Journal of ultrasound medicine, 2007. 26: 1389-1401. 

Special thanks to Dr.  Kerri Layman for her scanning skills and excellent clinical care!

“Please I&D this Abscess”

A 65 year old male with a history of DM, A-fib, and HTN with a recent CABG 8 months prior was sent to the emergency department from his primary care doctor’s office for “I&D of an abscess”.  The patient had visited the office with a chief complaint of pain, swelling, and erythema at the medial aspect of his anterior upper thigh. The patient was febrile with a temperature of 38.5, pulse of 98, BP 158/98, RR 12 at 98% on RA. Physical exam revealed a well nourished, well hydrated gentleman with clear lungs, irregularly irregular heart sounds with no murmurs, and a soft abdomen with active bowel sounds and no tenderness or masses. His extremities were warm and well perfused and 2+ bilateral DP and PT pulses were noted.  On his left anterior thigh in the groin region a 4″x4″ erythemetous area was noted with a palpable 2″X2″ fluctuate mass.  Bedside ultrasound of the area revealed the following:


Download Video

Figure 1: A 13-6 MHz transducer (vascular probe) is used to obtain these images of the soft tissue of the patients thigh, directly over the femoral vessels. In this view the structure are oriented in transverse view, and we see what appears to be pulsatile flow directly beneath the area of warmth and erythema previously intended for I&D.


Download Video

Figure 2: Upon closer inspection of the pulsatile mass we see swirling, bidirectional or “yin-yang” color flow in the lumen.

Conclusion: Procedure-related vascular injuries often follow percutaneous procedures, and include perivascular hematomas, pseudoaneurysms, and AV fistulas.  A pseudoaneurysm is a pulsatile hematoma contained within the surrounding tissues that communicates with the artery and represents injury to all three layers of the arterial wall.  Pseudoaneurysms complicate 0.1-0.2% of diagnostic and 3.5-5.5% of interventional procedures, and represent the majority of interventional vascular complications (1). On clinical exam a pulsatile mass is noted with a palpable thrill, and color duplex sonography demonstrates the turbulent, bidirectional flow seen in figure 2.  The treatment of choice is sonographically guided thrombin injection, which will thrombose the pseudoaneurysm in seconds with a 93-100% success rate (2,3). A void of flow after injection confirms success.

1. Kronzon I. Diagnosis and treatment of iatrogenic femoral artery pseudoaneurysm: a review. J Am Soc Echocardioagraphy 1997; 10:236-245

2. Morgan R, Belli A. Current treatment methods for post-catheterization pseudoaneurysms. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14:697-710.

3. Brophy DP, Sheiman RG, Amatulle P, Akbari CM. Iatrogenic femoral pseudoaneurysms: thrombin injection after failed US-guided compression. Radiology 2000; 214: 278-282.

Recommended reading: Gaitini D, Razi N, Ghersin E, et al. Sonographic Evaluation of Vascular injuries. Journal of Ultrasound Medicine 2008; 27:95-107.

Special thanks to Dr. Kirsten Bendeck for her scanning skills and excellent clinical care!

Syncope with a history of Marfan’s Disease…

A 53 yo woman collapsed in a crowd while celebrating inuaguration day on the mall in January of 2009. EMS was called by bystanders, who arrived to find the patient supine and in severe distress. She was able to reveal a medical history of Marfan’s disease, then became hypotensive and diaphoretic. She was immediately transported to the emergency department, where she was noted to be bradycadic, hypotensive, and unresponsive. She was intubated, central venous access was obtained, and a comprehensive workup including a chest and abdominal CT was performed.  A bedside echocardiogram and abdominal ultrasound to evaluate the aorta were also performed. Initially no contrast was seen within the aorta, limiting the study for visualization of dissection or an intimal flap. However, upon repeat evaluation, the study reveals a complex dissection flap extending from the ascending aorta to bilateral iliac arteries, involving the L subclavian, common carotid, and renal artery. These bedside ultrasound images were obtained within the initial 20 minutes of the resuscitation:


Download Video

Figure 1: Transverse view of the descending aorta. A low frequency, phased array probe is used for all images. Here the probe marker is oriented toward the patient’s R shoulder. Note the hyperechoic dissection flap seen in this cross-sectional view of the vessel.


Download Video

Figure 2: Longitudinal view of the descending aorta. In this view the bright dissection flap is seen extending the length of the vessel at its posterior aspect.


Download Video

Figure 3: A suprasternal view of the ascending aorta is obtained by placing the probe in the patient’s suprasternal notch, marker oriented straight up toward the patient’s head. The dissection flap is visible in this view as well, mandating surgical involvement.

Conclusion: The patient was taken emergently to the OR where she experienced complete hemodynamic collapse. Resuscitative efforts were unsuccessful, and she eventually died of complications of her disease.

Recommended reading: Bilku R, Steadman C, Jordan P. Acute deBakey type III (or Stanford type B) aortic dissection diagnosed by transthoracic
echocardiography. Journal of American Society of Echocardiography. 2008; 21(9): 1080-1083.

Special thanks to Dr.s Annette Dorfman and Jeremy Berman for their scanning skills and excellent clinical care!

This section is for musculoskeletal ultrasound images.

This section is for ocular ultrasound images.